
Welcome to the Build-A-Bull Market


âWelcome to Friday, futurists.Â
In a timeline where a stuffed animal company is outperforming the chip that powers ChatGPT, we've officially entered the Teddy Bear Industrial Complex. While tech bros worship at the altar of semiconductor salvation, suburban moms are building generational wealth one customizable Toothless⢠at a time.
Although we at Future Commerce have been spilling ink over tariff implications for months, it seems like C-level execs are just now getting the memo, or at the very least, are being a bit more honest with shareholders.Â
Here are some of the headlines from recent earnings results:
- GAP reported flat net sales for Q2, with Athletaâs performance continuing to free-fall, and both Gap and Old Navy seeing slight increases for the quarter. Inventory investment increased by 9%, primarily due to higher tariffs.
- Victoriaâs Secret saw net sales (3%) and comp sales (4%) increase, and although net income was down nearly 44%, the companyâs CEO, Hillary Super, reported that its turnaround efforts were starting to show positive results.
- Dickâs Sporting Goods continues to see positive sales momentum as it doubles down on its House of Sport concept and inches closer to finalizing its acquisition of Foot Locker. The company has raised its total guidance for the year.
- Five Below saw strong numbers across quarterly sales (+23.7%), comp sales (+12.4%), and net income (+29.5%). These results are largely due to the retailerâs focus on expanding its assortment and capitalizing on familiesâ desire to treasure hunt for decent products at incredible prices.
- Build-A-Bearâs results for the first half of 2025 have smashed company records, realizing an increase of 11.5% in total revenues. Net sales for the quarter increased by 10.8%, with consolidated eCommerce demand growing by 15.1%.
- Dillardâs released its results about two weeks ago, but itâs worth noting that while many department stores are feeling the squeeze, the company continues to see quarterly sales gains.Â
Weâre not surprised that Build-A-Bear is holding strong. In a 2018 podcast, I noted that the brand had pivoted towards licensing, was creatively driving social and UGC through annual âpay your ageâ sales, which subsequently caused lines of hundreds in malls around the country.
A recent thread on X reaffirmed that weâre overlooking retailers like Build-A-Bear and Dillardâs, which have maintained strong stock performance over the past year and beyond, even against hot investments like Nvidia.Â
But mostly? They understand that in 2025, comfort is the ultimate luxury. Even if that comfort comes in the form of a $30 teddy bear that sounds like your dead grandmother when you squeeze its paw.
The bears are winning, futurists. Embrace the chaos.
âPhillip


Ssense and Sensibility? Ssense, the Montreal-based luxury eTailer that was once a digital touchstone for fashion obsessives, is filing for bankruptcy protection after creditors pushed for a forced sale. CEO Rami Atallah said it would fight a sale by filing its own application under the Companiesâ Creditors Arrangement Act, which will allow the team to restructure its finances. The goal, according to Atallah, is to âprotect the company, keep control of our assets and operations, and fight for the future of our company,â according to a memo.
Our Take: Atallah pointed to a confluence of factors that brought Ssense to where it is today, including Trump-era tariffs and the collapse of de minimis exemptions. However, there are broader shifts within the luxury space that are impacting all players: economic uncertainty and geopolitical volatility are expected to drive declines of 2% to 5% in the sector. Younger, aspirational consumers, Ssenseâs base, are especially squeezed, pulling back on discretionary purchases and instead focusing on âlittle treatsâ like blind boxes.
The optics are striking: as Future Commerce contributor Edmond Lau noted, Ssense was âa godsend for people that donât live in fashion capitals, and needed or wanted access to interesting clothes.â Will the absence of online curators reaffirm the need for Ssense and be the cornerstone for its eventual comeback? Or, as Lau noted, will it spur a more localized resurgence of physical experiences?

âGold Diggerâ˘. In an extreme case of âif you canât beat 'em, join 'em,â Jordan Hudson is leaning into public scrutiny of her relationship with Bill Belichick by filing a trademark for the term âgold digger.â (Seriously?)
TCE Rights Management, a company managed by Hudson, filed the application this week, noting that the term would be used on jewelry, keychains, and other accessories. Like Sydney Sweeney and Bella Hadid before her, Hudson is attempting to take control of her identity, using a typically derogatory term to acquire financial wealth and independence. While Sweeneyâs soap quickly sold out and can currently be purchased through eBay for a whopping $220 per bar, weâre unsure whether Hudson (or her design talent) has the credibility or cult-like following to warrant such a response.


âThe Elite Return Economy. Wealthy shoppers arenât just buying more; theyâre returning more, too. A new Bank of America Institute report shows higher-income households refunded 5.3% of purchases in 2025, compared with just 3.7% of lower-income shoppers. Why? Speculative shopping.
Affluent consumers can afford to âbracketâ their purchases, which means they buy multiple sizes or colors and return most of them. Bracketing became a mainstream behavior during COVID lockdowns, when consumers werenât able to visit stores to touch, test, and try on items.Â
Many retailers rolled out and expanded their free returns policies to accommodate these behaviors, but the tide has slowly been turning. Consumers returned a staggering $890 billion of merchandise in 2024, and as a result, retailers have started to reduce return windows and even charge for returns. Now, with tariffs adding additional cost pressures, retailers may further restrict flexibility. For the wealthy, returns will likely remain an indulgence, but for everyone else, it could soon become a luxury.

âAlo's $3K Bag Says Health is Wealth. Would you buy a $3,000 Alo bag? CEO Danny Harris hopes the answer is a resounding âyes.â Next month, the brand will launch a three-style handbag collection priced from $1,200 to $3,600. The venture into luxury will be commemorated with a star-studded campaign, which will launch on September 8, when bags will be available for pre-order. âHealth is wealth,â Harris said. âHealth is luxury wellness, mindfulness, mental wellnessâthis is the future.â And apparently, our new definition of mindfulness and mental wellness is tethered to fine leather goods.

Liquid Death Cries in Canned Water. In the beverage industryâs latest shakeup, PepsiCo is buying the Rockstar Energy brand in the US and Canada from Celsius. The CPG conglomerate is also increasing its stake in Celsius by 11% and granting the company access to its distribution infrastructure, helping it deliver Alani Nu cans to more stores and consumer doorsteps across the US and Canada.
The bigger news? It wasnât Liquid Death. Fewer options for exit exist (h/t Nick Shackelford), leaving the bad boy water brand to continue its category expansion march (it added energy in July).


âAI Gets Dumber Names (While Getting Smarter). It really is the inverse naming index, isnât it? Google has unveiled Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, nicknamed "nano-banana," an image generation model that promises faster rendering, character consistency, and precise edits, powered by natural language. For developers, creatives, and strategic leaders, it means building apps and remixing visual assets at scale with near real-time speed. The model is available via the Gemini API and Google AI Studio for developers, as well as Vertex AI for enterprises.
Our Take: On one hand, the modelâs ability to generate consistent branded content, campaign imagery, and even product catalogs could streamline workflows and cut costs. On the other hand, it raises the question: Will brands use AI to unlock new creative possibilities, or will they simply churn out templated content at an industrial scale?
âSkechersâ recent AI gooner ad proves the tech can veer into uncanny territory when poorly applied. However, as we have learned in our exploration of Positionless Marketing, AI can also free teams from repetitive and time-consuming tasks, allowing them to focus on more creative and innovative work. As image generation becomes more accessible, the challenge for marketers wonât just be adopting tools like nano-bananaâit will be keeping the human spark of originality alive.



